The Hexagram Audit, Explained
The free diagnostic tells you which pillar is weakest. The Audit tells you why, and exactly what to build first, in what order, with what evidence.
The Hexagram Diagnostic takes eight minutes and produces a Gap Map: your three weakest pillars, scored against the other three. Founders who run it often ask the same question afterward. Now what?
The honest answer is that the Diagnostic was never meant to be the whole answer. It is a screening instrument. It tells you where to look. The Hexagram Audit is where you actually look.
What is a six-pillar marketing audit?
Most marketing "audits" in the Indian market are single-discipline reviews wearing a bigger title. An agency reviews your ad account and calls it a marketing audit. A consultant reviews your website copy and calls it a marketing audit. Both are useful, and neither is an audit of your marketing architecture, because both are looking at one pillar in isolation.
A six-pillar audit is structurally different. It examines all six dimensions, Architect, Signal, Conversion, Intelligence, Resonance, Vision, not independently but as an interlocking system, because that is how they actually function in a real business. A weak Architect pillar (undefined positioning) does not just sit there quietly. It degrades your Signal (content with nothing specific to say), your Conversion (landing pages that convert generically), and your Resonance (a founder voice with no sharp point of view to project). A single-discipline audit cannot see this. It can only tell you the ad creative underperformed, not why.
The Hexagram Audit scores every pillar, maps the dependencies between them, and identifies the root cause pillar: the one that, if fixed, improves the others, rather than the reverse.
How to read your Gap Map results
The instinct on receiving a Gap Map is to start with the lowest score. This is usually the wrong instinct.
The right question is not "which pillar scores worst" but "which weak pillar is upstream of the others." A business can score low on Conversion and low on Architect simultaneously, and the temptation is to fix Conversion first because it feels closer to revenue. But if the Architect score is low because positioning is undocumented, the Conversion problem is downstream: the landing pages are generic because the positioning behind them is generic. Fixing Conversion first means redesigning a landing page against a foundation that is still unclear, which produces another generic landing page, just a better-looking one.
Read your Gap Map by asking, for each weak pillar: is this weak because of something structural inside this pillar, or because a pillar upstream of it has not given it anything solid to build on? The Audit exists to answer that question with evidence rather than guesswork.
Why a structured audit beats an ad hoc marketing review
An ad hoc review usually happens because something is visibly wrong: a campaign underperformed, a quarter missed target, an agency relationship soured. The review that follows is reactive and narrow. It examines the thing that visibly broke, not the system that allowed it to break.
The Hexagram Audit is deliberately not triggered by a visible failure. It runs on all six pillars regardless of which one appears to be the problem, because the pillar that appears to be the problem is frequently not the pillar that is actually broken. This is the single most common finding across audits we run: the business came in convinced their content strategy was failing, and left understanding their positioning had never been documented in the first place.
A structured audit also produces something an ad hoc review cannot: a prioritised sequence. Not a list of everything wrong, which is overwhelming and undifferentiated, but an order. Build this first, because it unlocks that. Fix this next, because it depends on what came before it. Sequencing is the actual output that changes what a founder does on Monday morning.
What the audit actually produces
Three documents.
A scored assessment of all six pillars, with the evidence behind each score, not just a number but the specific gaps that produced it.
A dependency map showing which weak pillars are root causes and which are symptoms of something upstream.
A prioritised roadmap: what to build first, second, and third, with a rough view of effort and expected impact for each, so the sequencing decision is not a matter of instinct but of visible tradeoffs.
This is the difference between a diagnostic and an audit. The Diagnostic tells a founder where the architecture is weak. The Audit tells them why, in what order to fix it, and what evidence supports that order. One takes eight minutes. The other is the actual foundation of an engagement.
If your Gap Map from the Hexagram Diagnostic showed more than one weak pillar, the Audit is the logical next step. The Diagnostic itself is an 8-minute self-assessment away, free at adg-advisory.com.
ADG ADVISORY
Find out where your marketing architecture is breaking down.